What is King Dragon Palace's health inspection score?

King Dragon Palace has a SafeDine safety score of 70 out of 100 (Grade B). This score is calculated from official government health inspection data, factoring in violation severity, recency, and trends.

When was King Dragon Palace last inspected?

King Dragon Palace was last inspected on September 22, 2025. SafeDine tracks official health department inspections and updates scores automatically.

How many health violations does King Dragon Palace have?

King Dragon Palace has 26 total violations across 3 inspections on record. Violations are categorized by severity: high priority, intermediate, and basic.

Is King Dragon Palace safe to eat at?

King Dragon Palace has a good safety record with a score of 70/100. While there are some noted violations, overall compliance is solid.

What type of cuisine does King Dragon Palace serve?

King Dragon Palace serves American cuisine. Visit their SafeDine page for safety scores, inspection history, and more details.

Official Health Record

King Dragon Palace

Name: King Dragon Palace
Address: 1099 NORTH DIVISION STREET, Peekskill, 10566
Rating: 70

1099 NORTH DIVISION STREET, Peekskill

Last inspected 8mo ago

▲Improving

Own or manage this restaurant?

Claim it to unlock analytics →

0Good

American

Better than 22% of american restaurants

Improving

3 inspections

Last: Sep 22, 2025

medium confidence

Directions Order

Inspections

Clean Rate

8.7

Avg Violations

9 months ago

Last Inspected

Top Concerns

Most common issues from recent inspections

Handwashing

Employees not properly washing hands — contamination risk

Temperature controlHigh Priority

Food not kept at safe temperatures — risk of bacterial growth

Cross-contamination

Raw and cooked foods not properly separated

Pest issues

Evidence of pests found during inspection

Sanitation

Equipment or surfaces not properly cleaned/sanitized

Score Analysis

How the SafeDine score is calculated

Live Data Feed

Starting Score

100

Total Deductions

-30

Final Score

Impact Breakdown

High Priority

-3 pts

Direct health hazards • 10 pts each

Intermediate

-0 pts

Potential hazards • 5 pts each

Basic

-17 pts

Best practices • 2 pts each

Freshness Penalty

-3 pts

Score reduced due to stale inspection data

Inspection Timeline

+8 pts

Latest

100% weight

2nd

60% weight

3rd

30% weight

How scoring works: Every restaurant starts at 100 points. Points are deducted for violations found during inspections.

Recent inspections are weighted more heavily. High priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact.

Location

Open location in Google Maps →

1099 NORTH DIVISION STREET, Peekskill, FL 10566

Open in Maps

View Menu Order Online

Violation Timeline

Feb 2024

1 inspections

6 basic

Feb

Sep 2025

2 inspections

1 high priority

19 basic

Inspection History

3 records on file

3 Inspection

Sep 25

Inspection InspectionLatest

6 Basic

6 total

88/100inspection score

−12 pts

Basic (6)

−12 pts

8CImproper use and storage of clean, sanitized equipment and utensils−2
10BNon-food contact surfaces and equipment are improperly designed, constructed, installed, maintained (equipment not readily accessible for cleaning, surface not smooth finish)−2
13AAdequate, leakproof, non-absorbent, vermin-proof, covered containers not provided where needed−2
11AManual facilities inadequate, technique incorrect; mechanical facilities not operated in accordance with manufacturer's instructions−2
14BEffective measures not used to control entrance (rodent-, insect-proof contruction). Harborage areas available for rodents, insects and other vermin−2
11BWiping cloths dirty, not stored properly in sanitizing solutions−2

Base deductions−12 pts

Sep 25

Inspection Inspection

1 High13 Basic

14 total

64/100inspection score

−36 pts

High Priority (1)

−10 pts

5CPotentially hazardous foods are not stored under refrigeration except during necessary preparation or approved precooling procedures (room temperature storage).−10

Basic (13)

−26 pts

14BEffective measures not used to control entrance (rodent-, insect-proof contruction). Harborage areas available for rodents, insects and other vermin−2
8CImproper use and storage of clean, sanitized equipment and utensils−2
10BNon-food contact surfaces and equipment are improperly designed, constructed, installed, maintained (equipment not readily accessible for cleaning, surface not smooth finish)−2
11DNon food contact surfaces of equipment not clean−2
11AManual facilities inadequate, technique incorrect; mechanical facilities not operated in accordance with manufacturer's instructions−2
14CPesticide application not supervised by a certified applicator−2
16Miscellaneous, Economic Violation, Choking Poster, Training.−2
12EHandwashing facilities inaccessible, improperly located, dirty, in disrepair, improper fixtures, soap, and single service towels or hand drying devices missing−2
12DToilet facilities inadequate, inconvenient, dirty, in disrepair, toilet paper missing, not self-closing doors, missing hand wash signs−2
8EAccurate thermometers not available or used to evaluate refrigerated or heated storage temperatures−2
13AAdequate, leakproof, non-absorbent, vermin-proof, covered containers not provided where needed−2
14AInsects, rodents present−2
11BWiping cloths dirty, not stored properly in sanitizing solutions−2

Base deductions−36 pts

Feb 24

Inspection Inspection

6 Basic

6 total

88/100inspection score

−12 pts

Basic (6)

−12 pts

15AFloors, walls, ceilings, not smooth, properly constructed, in disrepair, dirty surfaces−2
11DNon food contact surfaces of equipment not clean−2
8AFood not protected during storage, preparation, display, transportation and service, from potential sources of contamination (e.g., food uncovered, mislabeled, stored on floor, missing or inadequate sneeze guards, food containers double stacked)−2
8CImproper use and storage of clean, sanitized equipment and utensils−2
15BLighting and ventilation inadequate, fixtures not shielded, dirty ventilation hoods, ductwork, filters, exhaust fans−2
16Miscellaneous, Economic Violation, Choking Poster, Training.−2

Base deductions−12 pts

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Leave a Review

Community Safety Reports

No reviewed safety reports. Help keep others safe by reporting any food safety concerns.

Data source: Florida DBPR · Official government inspection records

Grading System

85 – 100
Excellent
70 – 84
Good
Below 70
Fair

About SafeDine Scores

Scores are calculated using official government inspection data. High Priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact, followed by Intermediate and Basic violations. Community reviews can adjust the score by up to 5 points when 3+ reviews are submitted.

Explore More

American Restaurants All New York Restaurants