What is Mojo 330 N Wabash's health inspection score?

Mojo 330 N Wabash has a SafeDine safety score of 11 out of 100 (Grade C). This score is calculated from official government health inspection data, factoring in violation severity, recency, and trends.

When was Mojo 330 N Wabash last inspected?

Mojo 330 N Wabash was last inspected on May 16, 2024. SafeDine tracks official health department inspections and updates scores automatically.

How many health violations does Mojo 330 N Wabash have?

Mojo 330 N Wabash has 26 total violations across 3 inspections on record. Violations are categorized by severity: high priority, intermediate, and basic.

Is Mojo 330 N Wabash safe to eat at?

Mojo 330 N Wabash has a safety score of 11/100, which suggests room for improvement. Review the detailed inspection history on SafeDine for more information.

Official Health Record

Mojo 330 N Wabash

Name: Mojo 330 N Wabash
Address: 330 N WABASH AVE, Chicago, 60611
Rating: 11

330 N WABASH AVE , Chicago

Data may be outdated — inspected 5/16/2024

▼Declining

Own or manage this restaurant?

Claim it to unlock analytics →

0Poor

Streeterville

Ranked #512 of 705 in Streeterville

Declining

3 inspections

Last: May 16, 2024

low confidence

Directions Order

Inspections

Clean Rate

8.7

Avg Violations

23 months ago

Last Inspected

Top Concerns

Most common issues from recent inspections

HandwashingHigh Priority

Employees not properly washing hands — contamination risk

Temperature control

Food not kept at safe temperatures — risk of bacterial growth

Employee hygiene

Personal hygiene practices not followed

Pest issuesHigh Priority

Evidence of pests found during inspection

Other violation

Regulatory compliance issue

Score Analysis

How the SafeDine score is calculated

Live Data Feed

Starting Score

100

Total Deductions

-89

Final Score

Impact Breakdown

High Priority

-9 pts

Direct health hazards • 10 pts each

Intermediate

-8 pts

Potential hazards • 5 pts each

Basic

-14 pts

Best practices • 2 pts each

Freshness Penalty

-18 pts

Score reduced due to stale inspection data

Inspection Timeline

-17 pts

Latest

100% weight

2nd

60% weight

3rd

30% weight

How scoring works: Every restaurant starts at 100 points. Points are deducted for violations found during inspections.

Recent inspections are weighted more heavily. High priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact.

Location

330 N WABASH AVE , Chicago, IL 60611

Open in Maps

View Menu Order Online

Violation Timeline

Nov 2022

1 inspections

1 intermediate

Nov

May 2024

2 inspections

6 high priority

4 intermediate

15 basic

Inspection History

3 records on file

1 Canvass Re-Inspection2 Canvass

May 24

Canvass Re-Inspection InspectionLatestPass w/ Conditions

3 High1 Med7 Basic

11 total2 risk factors

41/100inspection score

−49 pts

High Priority (3)

−30 pts

1PERSON IN CHARGE PRESENT, DEMONSTRATES KNOWLEDGE, AND PERFORMS DUTIESRisk Factor−10
PIC DOESN'T HAVE CERTIFIED FOOD MANAGERS CERTIFICATE MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN.(PRIORITY FOUNDATION 7-38-012)
2CITY OF CHICAGO FOOD SERVICE SANITATION CERTIFICATERisk Factor−10
OBSERVED NO CERTIFIED FOOD MANAGER ON DUTY WHILE TCS FOODS ARE BEING PREPARED,HANDLED AND SERVED SUCH AS (EGGS,HAM,ETC)MUST BE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.(PRIORITY FOUNDATION 7-38-012)(CITATION ISSUED)
10ADEQUATE HANDWASHING SINKS PROPERLY SUPPLIED AND ACCESSIBLE−10
6-301.14 : OBSERVED NO HAND WASHING SIGNS AT HAND SINKS IN STAFF TOILET ROOMS MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN

Intermediate (1)

−5 pts

36THERMOMETERS PROVIDED & ACCURATE−5
-204.112(B) : MUST PROVIDE AN INTERNAL THERMOMETER FOR COLD HOLDING TABLE TOP DISPLAY UNIT,DIGITAL READING IS DISPLAYING IN CELSIUS ONLY.

Basic (7)

−14 pts

40PERSONAL CLEANLINESS−2
2-402.11 : OBSERVED EMPLOYEES NOT WEARING HAIR RESTRAINTS WHILE HANDLING FOOD MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN
41WIPING CLOTHS: PROPERLY USED & STORED−2
3-304.14 Inspector Comments: MUST STORE CLEAN AND DIRTY WIPING CLOTHS PROPERLY.
44UTENSILS, EQUIPMENT & LINENS: PROPERLY STORED, DRIED, & HANDLED−2
4-903.11 (A;B;D) Inspector Comments: MUST INVERT MULTI-USE UTENSILS ON SHELVING UNITS
49NON-FOOD/FOOD CONTACT SURFACES CLEAN−2
4-601.11(C) : MUST CLEAN DEBRIS BUILD UP ON INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF EQUIPMENT, COOLERS, SHELVING UNITS.
55PHYSICAL FACILITIES INSTALLED, MAINTAINED & CLEAN−2
: 6-501.13 : MUST CLEAN DEBRIS BUILD UP AND SPILLAGE FROM FLOOR UNDER,AROUND,ALONG WALL BASES IN PREP AREA
55PHYSICAL FACILITIES INSTALLED, MAINTAINED & CLEAN−2
6-501.114: MUST ELEVATE ARTICLES OFF OF FLOOR AND AWAY FROM WALLS IN PREP AREA
57ALL FOOD EMPLOYEES HAVE FOOD HANDLER TRAINING−2
2-102.13 : OBSERVED NO FOOD HANDLERS TRAINING FOR EMPLOYEES MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN.

Base deductions−49 pts

Risk factor bonus (2× +5)−10 pts

May 24

Canvass InspectionFail

3 High3 Med8 Basic

14 total2 risk factors

29/100inspection score

−61 pts

High Priority (3)

−30 pts

3MANAGEMENT, FOOD EMPLOYEE AND CONDITIONAL EMPLOYEE; KNOWLEDGE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND REPORTINGRisk Factor−10
OBSERVED NO SIGNED EMPLOYEES HEALTH POLICIES FOR ALL EMPLOYEES MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN.(PRIORITY FOUNDATION 7-38-010)(CITATION ISSUED)
8HANDS CLEAN & PROPERLY WASHEDRisk Factor−10
OBSERVED POOR HYGIENIC PRACTICES BY FOOD HANDLER.OBSERVED FEMALE FOOD HANDLER WEARING PLASTIC GLOVES AS SHE RINGS THE REGISTER AND THEN HANDLED READY TO EAT FOODS SHE MADE TOAST AND THEN AGAIN SHE RUNG THE REGISTER HANDLED SLICED HAM WITH THE SAME GLOVES ON STILL WITHOUT WASHING HANDS. INSTRUCTED MANAGER TO HAVE EMPLOYEE TO WASH HANDS AFTER EVERY POSSIBLE CONTAMINATION.(PRIORITY 7-38-010)(COS)(CITATION ISSUED)
10ADEQUATE HANDWASHING SINKS PROPERLY SUPPLIED AND ACCESSIBLE−10
OBSERVED NO HAND WASHING SIGNS AT HAND SINKS IN STAFF TOILET ROOMS MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN.

Intermediate (3)

−15 pts

25CONSUMER ADVISORY PROVIDED FOR RAW/UNDERCOOKED FOOD−5
OBSERVED NO CONSUMER ADVISORY DISCLOSURE NOR REMINDER ON MENU OF CONSUMING RAW AND UNDERCOOKED FOODS MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN.(PRIORITY FOUNDATION 7-38-005)
36THERMOMETERS PROVIDED & ACCURATE−5
MUST PROVIDE AN INTERNAL THERMOMETER FOR COLD HOLDING TABLE TOP DISPLAY UNIT,DIGITAL READING IS DISPLAYING IN CELSIUS ONLY.
37FOOD PROPERLY LABELED; ORIGINAL CONTAINER−5
MUST LABEL FOOD STORAGE CONTAINERS WHEN FOOD IS NOT IN ORIGINAL PACKAGE (SQUEEZE BOTTLES)

Basic (8)

−16 pts

40PERSONAL CLEANLINESS−2
OBSERVED EMPLOYEES NOT WEARING HAIR RESTRAINTS WHILE HANDLING FOOD MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN.
41WIPING CLOTHS: PROPERLY USED & STORED−2
MUST STORE CLEAN AND DIRTY WIPING CLOTHS PROPERLY.
44UTENSILS, EQUIPMENT & LINENS: PROPERLY STORED, DRIED, & HANDLED−2
MUST INVERT MULTI-USE UTENSILS ON SHELVING UNITS.
46GLOVES USED PROPERLY−2
OBSERVED EMPLOYEE USING GLOVES IMPROPERLY.
49NON-FOOD/FOOD CONTACT SURFACES CLEAN−2
MUST CLEAN DEBRIS BUILD UP ON INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR OF EQUIPMENT, COOLERS, SHELVING UNITS.
55PHYSICAL FACILITIES INSTALLED, MAINTAINED & CLEAN−2
MUST CLEAN DEBRIS BUILD UP AND SPILLAGE FROM FLOOR UNDER,AROUND,ALONG WALL BASES IN PREP AREA.
55PHYSICAL FACILITIES INSTALLED, MAINTAINED & CLEAN−2
MUST ELEVATE ARTICLES OFF OF FLOOR AND AWAY FROM WALLS IN PREP AREA.
57ALL FOOD EMPLOYEES HAVE FOOD HANDLER TRAINING−2
OBSERVED NO FOOD HANDLERS TRAINING FOR EMPLOYEES MUST PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN.

Base deductions−61 pts

Risk factor bonus (2× +5)−10 pts

Nov 22

Canvass InspectionPass

1 Med

1 total

95/100inspection score

−5 pts

Intermediate (1)

−5 pts

36THERMOMETERS PROVIDED & ACCURATE−5
Missing thermometer in prep coolers, instructed to provide.

Base deductions−5 pts

Community Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Leave a Review

Community Safety Reports

No reviewed safety reports. Help keep others safe by reporting any food safety concerns.

Data source: Chicago CDPH · Official government inspection records

Grading System

85 – 100

Excellent

70 – 84

Good

Below 70

Fair

About SafeDine Scores

Scores are calculated using official government inspection data. High Priority violations (direct health hazards) have the greatest impact, followed by Intermediate and Basic violations. Community reviews can adjust the score by up to 5 points when 3+ reviews are submitted.

Explore More

Restaurants in Chicago Unknown Restaurants Best in Chicago All Illinois Restaurants